Pattern one
Three opinions, no measurements
Consultations at several practices, three different recommendations, and no written angle or sensory data from any of them. The first useful step is one documented baseline everyone can argue from.
For a large constant deviation, surgery is usually the right answer and we will say so. For a small or intermittent one it often is not, and families are rarely given the measurements that separate the two. We provide an independent, documented strabismus assessment by secure telehealth, and we write to your treating clinician with what we find.
A squint consultation that ends in a surgical recommendation without these three figures on paper has skipped the step that tells you whether the recommendation is the only reasonable one.
The first is the angle of deviation, in prism dioptres, at distance and at near. Angles that differ substantially between the two distances point to different underlying mechanisms and sometimes to different operations. The second is whether the deviation is constant or intermittent and, if intermittent, how the control is graded.
The third is the sensory status: is one eye suppressed, and is there any measurable stereopsis. This is the one most often missing, and it is the one that predicts what a successful operation will actually deliver. A patient with residual fusion potential and one with dense long-standing suppression can have the same angle and very different realistic outcomes.
Ask for the angle at distance and near in prism dioptres, the control grading, and the stereoacuity in seconds of arc. Any thorough assessment produces all three. Having them written down makes a second opinion faster, cheaper and considerably more useful — including one from us.
A documented telehealth assessment, then either a therapy programme or a written referral with our measurements attached.
Establishing the numbers
The deviation measured in prism dioptres at distance and near, the control graded, fixation and stereoacuity recorded. You receive the numbers in writing, which makes a surgical second opinion a comparison rather than a fresh start.
Correcting the optics
The cycloplegic correction confirmed and coordinated, with a settling interval. Where accommodation is driving an inward turn, this phase alone can change the entire clinical picture.
The therapy itself
Fusion range built progressively, with anti-suppression work where the deviating eye is being ignored, delivered as short specified daily practice rather than general exercises.
Measuring the change
Remeasurement at session eight against baseline. Control is the figure that moves first, so it is the one we hold the programme to.
A second opinion is not a challenge to your clinician. It is a normal part of a decision this size, and most surgeons expect it.
Delhi and the NCR
The NCR has a dense supply of eye care and a correspondingly wide spread of advice. What is often missing is not expertise but a comparable set of numbers to weigh it against.
Pattern one
Consultations at several practices, three different recommendations, and no written angle or sensory data from any of them. The first useful step is one documented baseline everyone can argue from.
Pattern two
A child with reasonable control most of the day. Surgery may still be right, but where fusion potential is good, a therapy trial before committing is a defensible and often cheaper first move.
Pattern three
Appearance corrected, everyone satisfied, sensory function never assessed. Where fusion potential remains, the first post-operative year is when it is most recoverable.
Second-opinion enquiries reach us from
We do not perform surgery and we have no financial interest in whether you have one. Where an operation is indicated we say so and refer, with our measurements.
Partly, and we are precise about the boundary. Cover testing with calibrated targets, control grading, suppression testing and stereoacuity can all be done remotely with the equipment we post to you and a parent following instructions on camera. What cannot be done remotely is a fine prism cover test in eccentric gaze positions, cycloplegic refraction, or any examination of the eye itself. Where those are needed we name them specifically so a single local appointment covers them, and we interpret the results with you afterwards.
It should not, and in our experience it does not. We send our measurements directly to the treating clinician in clinical language, and the message is a set of numbers rather than a recommendation about their decision. Surgeons generally welcome sensory data they did not have. If a clinician reacts badly to a documented second reading of the same patient, that is worth knowing too.
That is exactly the right question to ask, and the answer depends on age and angle. In a young child with a large constant deviation, delay does have a real cost and we would not recommend a therapy trial. In an older child with an intermittent deviation and reasonable control, six months is not a critical window and a trial is low risk. We set a decision point in advance — a specific measurement at a specific session — so that a trial cannot quietly turn into indefinite postponement.
In one specific and fairly common situation, yes, completely. Accommodative esotropia occurs when a child is significantly long-sighted and the focusing effort required to see clearly drags the eyes inward. Full cycloplegic correction removes the focusing demand and the eyes straighten, sometimes immediately. This is why a cycloplegic refraction must precede any discussion of surgery in a child with an inward turn: a proportion of these cases need spectacles and nothing else.
Control grading records how well fusion is maintained: whether the deviation is manifest spontaneously, appears only after the eyes are dissociated, and how quickly alignment recovers. It matters more than the raw angle because it tracks function rather than anatomy. Two children with an identical measured angle can have entirely different visual experience, and control is the variable that separates them. It is also the number that moves first when therapy is working.
Telehealth Nationwide · Clinics in the South
Assessment delivered to Delhi by secure telehealth — in-person prism testing available at our Chennai and Hyderabad clinics.
One documented telehealth assessment gives you the angle at both distances, the control grading and the stereoacuity, in writing, to take to whichever clinician you choose.